Curious to see how the book will grade this?
They probably just saw players stats and figured he didnt play b/c he didnt have any receptions or targets
I don't think playing ST constitutes playing a snap for prop purposes but every book is different. In my experience, it needs to be an offensive snap.
And obviously given it is sports betting, you can't really fight city hall too much.
He played an offensive snap but even if he didn't, his special teams action should warrant "taking the field." My complaint got sent to the prop department so I'm just awaiting the change.
Well this is ridiculous. They only look at ESPN and since he doesn't show up there, they won't change it from a no bet. The most frustrating part is the guy continues to say "he didn't play." I offered to walk them through it on nfl.com and they just refuse. It's a PPH site so this is fairly normal (grading bets wrong) but this is the first time for me where they refuse to look further into it.
The official stats are from NFL.com not ESPN.<dt style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; line-height: 1.42857; font-weight: 700; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">PLAYER PROPS:</dt><dd style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; line-height: 1.42857; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">All players must take the field and play for action. Results are based on the official stats from the game.</dd><dd style="box-sizing: border-box; padding: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 40px; line-height: 1.42857; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;">A kicker who does not participate, due to shutout, but is suited up and available is considered to have played.</dd>